Author

Historian

Browsing

History Of The Funj Sultanate

Funj Sultanate

Funj Sultanate: From around 1500 to 1821, the Sinnar sultanate ruled over part of Sudan’s northern Nile Valley, the last in a long line of precolonial kingdoms that form one of the world’s most ancient and persistent civilized statecraft traditions. The sultanate’s largest area stretched from the Ottoman Egyptian border at the Third Cataract southward to the Ethiopian highlands and the Sobat River, and from the Red Sea westward across the Nile to cover the Nuba Mountains and Kordofan. 

The sultanate emerged from the ashes of the medieval Nubian kingdoms of Makuria and Alodia, during which Egyptian conquerors introduced Islam and Arabic. RED Major trade routes. Selima Oasis DARFUR Kobbai BERBERISTAN Second cataract Third cataract. Old Dongola BEJA Fourth cataract FUNJ SULTANATE, 6th cataract Qarri SEA, 5th cataract Shendi Arbaji El-Obeid 0 0 100 miles, 200 kilometers TAQALI Sennar Funj sultanate, 16th–17th centuries. Funj sultanate, 16th–17th centuries. 

Suakin ETHIOPIA addressed the Nubian world, and as a result, the kings of Sinnar accepted Islam as the state religion and Arabic as the administrative language, reestablishing their realm on traditional African foundations. In addition to having a northern and central core of Nubian speakers, the sultanate expanded to include extensive eastern, western, and southern borders of ethnically diverse subject peoples. The Funj, Sinnar’s hereditary ruling class, descended from a remote mythical ancestor’s female line. A royal court of titled high officials chose the king among the sons of Funj noblewomen by previous rulers. 

Unless a noble man acquired the hand of a princess, his position perished with him; hence, the pursuit and bestowal of noble Funj spouses served as a key element of statecraft. A hierarchy of noble status and governmental positions emerged, with each successful lord owing political responsibilities to the superior from whom he got a Funj wife, as well as his title and office, while staying socially subservient to his maternal uncle indefinitely. 

Also Read: Fatimid Caliphate: The Incredible Empire in Maghrib, 910–1057

For example, if the royal court rejected and removed the monarch, his maternal uncle would be responsible for his execution. Subordinate lords, in turn, gave their superiors female relatives of Funj lineage as wives; thus, the monarch had approximately 600 noble wives, a senior nobleman about 200, and a lesser lord about 30. Sinnar was primarily an agricultural civilization, where the king, theoretically, derived the majority of its income from land.

Funj Sultanate

The Funj nobility’s kinship pyramid also helped to organize the realm’s territorial division into major provinces and subordinate district governates. The monarch, after reserving some estates as personal demesnes, assigned the majority of the realm to a number of his kinsmen as provincial governates; they, in turn, reserved demesnes and split their provinces as district governates among their kinsmen. 

Lesser lords not only obeyed and served their superiors politically but also paid homage to them with high-quality commodities from their estates, such as cloth, tobacco, gold, ivory, horses, medicines, spices, and perfumes. Superior noblemen redistributed exotic types of wealth acquired through activities monopolized by the central government, most notably slaves abducted by legal procedure or combat, as well as foreign luxury commodities imported from overseas by royal trading expeditions. 

Legally, subjects supported their lord’s estate by paying substantial levies on grain production and animal husbandry, along with a wide range of fees and responsibilities, either in kind or through labor services. Strict sumptuary rules maintained a social distance between noblemen and subjects, and serious kinds of transgression, such as leaving one’s estate without permission or bearing the progeny of an illicit mixed union, were punishable by servitude. 

The Sinnar sultanate had peaceful ties with its neighbors for the majority of its existence, but a record of significant events must necessarily highlight the outliers. Sinnar tried to restrict the Ottoman Empire’s advances in the sixteenth century, both along the Nile in the north and, with imperial Ethiopia’s help, on the Red Sea coast. 

Also Read: Fatimid Caliphate: The Incredible Empire in Maghrib, 910–1057

As the Funj pushed southward up the Blue Nile to conquer the gold-producing area of Fazughli in the seventeenth century, their ties with Ethiopia deteriorated; significant Ethiopian expeditions faced significant setbacks in 1618–1619 and 1744. During the eighteenth century, Sinnar and her fur-speaking western neighbors engaged in an increasingly fierce war over the huge gold-producing territory of Kordofan, which lay between the two kingdoms’ heartlands.

Funj Sultanate

The Musabba’at, a defeated and exiled section of the Dar Fur royal line, first established itself in Kordofan and used it as a base for an attempt to re-conquer their homeland; after 1785, the Dar Fur sultans struck eastward to impose their rule at the expense of both Funj Sultanate and Musabba’at. Sinnar was demonstrating signs of internal weakness in the early nineteenth century, which drew increased acquisitive attention from Egypt’s Turkish rulers. 

The Funj Sultanate kingdom reached its pinnacle during the reigns of the powerful seventeenth-century monarchs Rubat I, Badi II, and Unsa II, who established diplomatic and commercial relations with the Islamic heartlands, established Sinnar as the first fixed urban capital for their previously agrarian realm, and transformed this new city into a large and cosmopolitan metropolis by dispatching royal caravans to attract foreigners with valuable goods and skills. 

However, these more personal contacts with the outside world could not fail to reveal aspects of Funj Sultanate culture, particularly noble Matrilin earity and royal rule over foreign business, that would undoubtedly be controversial from a Middle Eastern cultural standpoint. As the eighteenth century progressed, invasive alien ideals found ever-larger native constituencies: demographically insignificant male Funj princes, persons aspiring to Islamic piety and erudition, governors barred from royal trade, and would-be merchants themselves. 

Funj Sultanate

Cultural dissidence manifested itself in the rise of towns, which increased from one in 1700 to about thirty by 1821, as well as escalating political chaos; royal matrilinearity was abolished in 1719, a military strongman reduced the king to a puppet in 1762, and by 1800, the urbanized fragments of the old agrarian realm had devolved into an indefinite civil war. 

Many dissidents cheered on the Turkish invaders from Egypt who took over the kingdom in 1820–1821, leaving the last defenders of the old order easily defeated.

Also Read: Fatimid Caliphate: The Incredible Empire in Maghrib, 910–1057

African Exploration Of Europeans

African Exploration African Exploration

African Exploration: Between roughly 1770 and 1880, Africa was explored, allowing for precise maps and publishable knowledge on the continent. Although Portuguese navigators had surveyed the beaches by 1500, the interior remained virtually unknown to Europeans until the late eighteenth century. Maps based on classical, Arab, or Portuguese knowledge were accessible earlier, but the famous French cartographer D’Anville dismissed them in 1749. 

Serious exploration entailed a few private adventurers, rarely traders, more commonly Christian missionaries, and, most importantly, official or quasi-official expeditions, often conducted by military personnel. Malaria, river rapids, and occasionally hostile locals necessitated pretty well-organized efforts. Geographic groups, particularly the Royal Geographical Society of London (RGS), missionary societies, and governments, professed to be driven by science or religion with no political agenda until the 1870s.

Nonetheless, explorers directly or indirectly assisted those who desired to transform Africa by obtaining its resources or access to its markets, abolishing the slave trade, or introducing the gospel. The explorers answered by depicting a continent in need of Europe’s knowledge, technology, and moral superiority, regardless of whether this meant political change. Africans themselves facilitated the expeditions by serving as porters, interpreters, and guides. 

The existing local political climate determined the reception of explorers. From 1768 to 1773, Scottish landowner James Bruce traveled to Ethiopia and observed the Blue Nile’s source. In 1788, a group of aristocrats formed the African Association to achieve for Africa what Captain Cook had done for the Pacific. The kingdoms of Western Sudan piqued people’s interest, since reports of their richness and magnificence had long spread throughout Europe. 

African Exploration African Exploration

This area received water from the Niger River. It wasn’t clear if it went west to the Atlantic, east to the Nile, or into the desert sand. The association’s initial excursions followed Saharan trade routes from the Mediterranean, with Friedrich Konrad Hornemann, the first German explorer of Africa, reaching Bornu before dying in 1800. The alternative starting point was the Atlantic coast, where Mungo Park, a young Scottish surgeon and Enlightenment child, reached the Niger in 1796, “glittering to the morning sun, as broad as the Thames at Westminster and flowing slowly eastward.”

A government, concerned with preventing French activity and aiding in the search for markets, sent Park back in 1805 to determine its actual flow. He died in 1806 at Bussa, far down the river, but his whereabouts remained unknown for many years. René Caillé began a lengthy French engagement with the western half of the region in 1827, when he arrived in Timbuktu, a mysterious city to Europeans. 

Meanwhile, British expeditions from the Mediterranean advanced into the center of the Niger; Hugh Clapperton captured Sokoto but not the river in 1824. He perished on the return journey, but in 1830, his former servant, Richard Lander, demonstrated that the Niger had debouched into the Gulf of Guinea. Attempts were made to send steamboats up the river, and Heinrich Barth, a British-funded German, finished his investigation of the Sudanic kingdoms in the early 1850s. 

In South Africa, Afrikaaner farmers from the Cape gradually settled along the south and east coasts, while travelers such as Gordon, Paterson, Burchell, and the missionary Robert Moffat reached Botswana by the 1840s. David Livingstone, Moffat’s son-in-law, visited the Zambesi in 1851. 

African Exploration African Exploration

Livingstone became convinced that he needed to open up a new channel to the interior for business and the gospel; the Zambesi appeared to be the solution. He arrived on the west coast at Luanda in 1854 and, in his greatest achievement, crossed the continent to the mouth of the Zambezi in 1856, stopping at the Victoria Falls along the way. 

Livingstone’s Missionary Travels and Researches, published in 1857, became one of the century’s best sellers, combining good science, exciting adventures, exotic scenes, and a powerful moral message. The Zambesi, like the Niger, did not provide an accessible route inland for steamboats, as Livingstone discovered between 1858 and 1864 when the government sent him to lead an expedition to follow up on his ideas, much to the dismay of the Portuguese, who had already penetrated the region north of the Zambesi with Dr. Lacerda (in 1798) and Majors Monteiro and Gamitto (in the 1830s). 

Although Livingstone arrived near Lake Malawi in 1859, his steamer was unable to reach it or travel far up the Zambezi. Meanwhile, rumors of other lakes further north, as well as news of snow-covered mountains seen by German Lutheran missionaries Johann Ludwig Krapf and Rebmann of the Anglican Church Missionary Society (CMS), sparked widespread interest, not least because the source of the Nile was assumed to be somewhere in the region. In 1858, the Royal Geographical Society sent Richard Burton and John Speke from the east coast to explore Lake Tanganyika. 

Speke turned north to find Lake Victoria, which he said was the source of the Nile river. He proved this in July 1862, after which he followed the river down to Egypt. Samuel Baker reached Lake Albert in 1864. However, he accidentally killed himself before a scheduled discussion with Burton. There were doubts about Speke’s Nile claims, which remained unresolved in 1873 when Livingstone passed away. The public portrayed him as a martyr to the slave trade, despite his desire to travel further south. He was at the Congo River’s source. 

Verney Cameron, assigned to find Livingstone, discovered his body but continued on to cross the Congo basin in 1874-1876. Henry Stanley, who became famous after discovering Livingstone in October 1871, solved the remaining problems between 1874 and 1877. After confirming Speke’s Nile source, he followed the Zaïre to the Atlantic. Stanley was well-funded, vicious, and efficient. In the early 1880s, the milder Joseph Thomson traveled peacefully in Kenya. Now, efforts were underway to carry on the explorers’ work.

African Exploration African Exploration

Following the Mahdist insurrection, Egypt attempted to establish an empire on the Upper Nile, leaving Emin Pasha stranded there. In 1886-1890, Stanley led an international expedition up the Zaïre and through the forest to “rescue” Emin Pasha, which had a significant impact on Belgian King Leopold. Stanley added the Ruwenzori range and other new features to the map, primarily as an imperialist venture amid the growing conflict between Belgian, British, and German interests.

Even indirectly, the explorers influenced events and attitudes as Africans grappled with advancing Western civilization. In general, popular descriptions of explorers’ and missionaries’ exploits tended to underestimate the challenges of introducing European technology and trade while disregarding or overlooking the interests and abilities of the people they encountered.

Also Read: Pan Africanism: The Incredible Conference That Changed Everything, 1958

History Of The Zagwe Dynasty

Zagwe Dynasty Zagwe Dynasty

Zagwe Dynasty dominion in the central Ethiopian highlands was one of the most notable periods in medieval history. The dynasty oversaw an active Christian expansion throughout the central Ethiopian plateau, as well as significant trade and cultural engagement with Egypt and the Middle East; it was also responsible for the development of some of Ethiopia’s most spectacular buildings. 

Despite this, subsequent chroniclers in the region have disparaged the Zagwes, portraying them as usurpers of power from the rightful “Solomonic” line. The Zagwes sought legitimacy by fabricating the story that they were descended from Moses. They also strove to assert moral authority through their magnificent architecture. 

However, despite the belief that angels created the Zagwe rock-hewn architecture, neither has impressed Ethiopia’s royal chroniclers, who have generally depicted the Zagwes as transgressors with no “Israelite” connection. Our understanding of the entire Zagwe period is fairly restricted, and the circumstances surrounding their rise to power are obscure. 

The Zagwes were originally Agaw speakers who lived in the province of Lasta, which had long been part of the Christian kingdom and was ideally positioned to benefit from north-south commerce and communication linkages. In the centuries since Axum’s demise, an increasingly powerful military and political class has assimilated into Semitic and Christian culture, forming the post-Axumite ruling elites.

Zagwe Dynasty Zagwe Dynasty

They seized power around 1150 (or 1137, according to Ethiopian tradition), but there is little evidence to suggest that their rise marked a “revolution” in the traditional sense or that there was a major incident at the time of the first Zagwe ruler’s accession. The assumption of royal powers by the Lasta political elite appears to have been the climax of a sociopolitical process that had been ongoing for at least two centuries and did not constitute a dramatic departure from the past. 

As the state grew, Christian military leaders, chosen from among the royal family or those close to it, were appointed as territorial governors with significant local powers; many members of the Zagwe court were drawn from Lasta and held high ecclesiastical and administrative positions, while military leadership and economic power were most likely awarded to such courtiers. 

With the support of a large army, Christian missionary activities accompanied the state’s geographical expansion, pushing Christian settlement and authority southward, particularly into Gojjam and the Shoan plateau. During Zagwe’s reign, the kingdom’s external ties improved significantly. 

The establishment of Fatimid Egypt rekindled commercial activity along the Red Sea, and the Ethiopian highlands benefited from these trade routes. The slave trade in particular increased, although gold and ivory were also key exports. Muslim merchants transported textiles and other luxury items from the Islamic world via Massawa on the Red Sea coast. 

In addition to greater commercial connection, the Zagwes expanded their ties with the Egyptian Coptic Church, and strong trade linkages between Ethiopia and Egypt allowed pilgrims from the highlands to go through Muslim territory on their trip to Jerusalem. Such encounters re-introduced the region to European notice, and by the twelfth century, legends about a remote but devoted and affluent “kingdom of Prester John” were spreading. 

Zagwe Dynasty Zagwe Dynasty

Visits to the Holy Land may also have inspired the period’s extraordinary rock-hewn churches. While there was already a practice of cutting churches out of solid rock, the Zagwes took the architectural form to the next level. The program of building rock-hewn churches began with Yimrha, the dynasty’s third emperor, but Lalibela is responsible for some of Ethiopia’s most magnificent architecture.

Around the beginning of the thirteenth century, at the height of the Zagwe state, Lalibela presided over what appears to have been an attempt to rebuild Jerusalem in the central Ethiopian highlands. The astounding findings indicate the prevalence of Christianity in the region, as well as the Zagwes’ willingness to assert their political and religious authority. 

This was also a time when, despite its ties to the Egyptian church, the Ethiopian church developed its own distinct characteristics, centered on the belief that it was a Christian outpost surrounded by infidels and that the Christians in the area were God’s chosen people. The increasing influence of the Old Testament led to the belief that the Christian kingdom was Israel’s real successor. 

Despite its significant successes, the Zagwe state’s vulnerabilities began to emerge by the early thirteenth century. Periodic succession problems exacerbated the Zagwes’ inability to build regional unity, leading to the formation of anti-Zagwe organizations among Semitic-speaking Tigrayans and Amhara.

The Christian community in Shoa, which had become wealthy due to the eastward trade routes and received support from the church, eventually posed the most formidable threat. Around 1268, Yekuno Amlak initiated the Shoan uprising, leading to a series of conflicts across Lasta and Begemedir. After the death of the last Zagwe monarch in 1270, Yekuno Amlak declared himself ruler.

In order to assert its own legitimacy, the new dynasty developed the myth that they descended from King Solomon and Queen Makeda of Saba; the “Solomonic” line claimed that it was now “restored” following the Zagwe usurpation, but it appears fair to say that Yekuno Amlak’s rise to power can only be considered a “restoration” if the monarch was once again a Semitic speaker. 

Zagwe Dynasty Zagwe Dynasty

While the Zagwes were generally denigrated after that, Lali Bela was later canonized by the Ethiopian church, and Zagwe influence continued to be felt in terms of both the architectural and administrative styles of a kingdom, the success of which was largely due to Zagwe ingenuity.

Also Read: Kingdom Of Aksum: The Complete History Of A Great African Kingdom

Olaudah Equiano History

Olaudah Equiano Olaudah Equiano

Olaudah Equiano, of Ibo descent, was born in a hamlet near modern-day Onitsha in 1745. Slave traders kidnapped him when he was about eleven years old, and after passing through several black owners, British slavers eventually sent him to the New World as one of three million Africans removed from Africa in the eighteenth century.

Gustavus Vassa was named after the Swedish king who had emancipated his people from Danish tyranny, most likely with irony in mind. He continued to use the moniker after emancipation, though he frequently qualified it on paper with the words “the African.” 

He endured a variety of hardships in the West Indies, converted to Christianity in 1759, and developed skills as a domestic worker, barber, sailor (including a stint in the Seven Years War against France), and independent trader.

Despite facing numerous deceptions from white customers, Equiano’s economic activities enabled him to accumulate sufficient wealth to secure his manumission in 1767. Equiano moved to London later that year and worked as a sailor for the next ten years, traveling to the Mediterranean and Levant, the West Indies (again), and the Arctic in one of the unsuccessful attempts to discover the North West Passage. 

He participated in a similar unsuccessful settlement effort on Nicaragua’s Mosquito Coast. He had a religious experience in October 1774 where he saw a vision of Christ and realized that divine mercy had saved him. In 1777, he began domestic work in London. One employer, struck by his Christian dedication, recommended missionary work in West Africa, but the Church of England, then uninterested in such activity, denied him ordination. 

Olaudah Equiano Olaudah Equiano

After a sea voyage to Philadelphia in 1784, where he encountered the city’s sizable free black community, Equiano eventually became involved in the Sierra Leone plot, which Granville Sharp, with whom he had been in contact since the early 1770s, had inspired.

In 1786, the British government appointed him “Commissary of Provisions and Stores for the Black Poor to Sierra Leone,” a position that in fact required him to balance the interests of his employers and those of the black settlers themselves. 

His efforts to protect both from the dishonesty of the white official in charge of the mission led to his wrongful dismissal in March of the following year. In 1789, Equiano published his autobiography, The Interesting Narrative, under his birth name and included his slave name as a subtitle.

It gained tremendous sales, thanks to its author’s promotional tours around the country, and was published in nine British editions, the final in 1794, when the tide turned against the abolitionist cause following the French revolutionary horror and the Saint-Domingue slave insurrection. 

The Interesting Narrative is a firsthand account of the violence that underpins the plantation system: the rapacity of slave traders, the inhumanity of the Middle Passage on slave ships, the savagery of plantation owners, and the treatment of black people (free and enslaved) by whites in the West Indies and American colonies. 

At the same time, it offers a picture of traditional African life that differs from the idealized and Arcadian views of many contemporaries of abolition; for example, Equiano mentions household slavery and local conflict in Ibo society. 

Olaudah Equiano Olaudah Equiano

He infuses his narrative with his passionate and profound evangelical Christianity, portraying slave-owners and slave-traffickers as “nominal Christians” corrupted by selfishness and immorality, who fail to treat others as they would have treated themselves. It is a worthy addition to John Wesley’s sermons against the evils of slavery. 

Above all, it is a personal declaration from someone who has lived as a slave. His depiction of the “red faces” of white slavers and the “large furnace” on the ship that brought him away from Africa (Chapter 3) is based on his personal experiences, engraved with the sharp instrument of boyhood recall. Equiano’s interesting narrative earned him a lot of attention during his life.

The Prince of Wales (later George IV) and the Duke of York were among its supporters. It gave Equiano a substantial return, ensuring a comfortable retirement. He married Susanna Cullen, a white woman, on April 7, 1792, and she died a year before him. Before the prohibition of the Atlantic slave trade, he passed away in London on March 31, 1797.

His fame lingered for a while, then faded away in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, when chroniclers praised Wilberforce and his white colleagues for their crusade against slavery and the slave trade while ignoring the contributions of Equiano and other former black slaves, such as Ignatius Sancho and Ottobah Cuguano. Since the 1960s, there has been an increase in interest in black history, particularly in the United States. 

Olaudah Equiano

It has resulted in a rediscovery of Equiano and his book, which has achieved “an iconic status” (Walvin 1994) in black diaspora studies. It has also provided future generations with an accurate and firsthand account of the African experience during the peak of the British plantation system in the late 18th century.

Also Read: Queen Nzinga: The Incredible History Of An African Warrior Queen

Equatorial Guinea Independence to Present Day

Guinea Independence Guinea Independence

Guinea Independence: Equatorial Guinea (Río Muni and the islands of Fernando Po [now Bioko] and Annobón) gained independence quickly after years of authoritarian rule under Franco’s Spain, but there was insufficient time for a grassroots nationalist movement to emerge.

Francisco Macías Nguema (1924–1979) was a leader known for persecution and breaches of basic human rights, comparable only to Idi Amin and the “emperor” Bokassa. Twenty years of rule under his nephew, Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo, have resulted in some limited progress, but the country continues to suffer from the dual heritage of colonial and postcolonial authoritarianism. 

Macías Nguema, a former court interpreter during colonial rule, was considered a “safe” candidate for Spain’s presidential elections leading up to independence on October 12, 1968. However, within a few months, he had disappointed his old masters by removing their ambassador and the local Spanish military presence, resulting in a massive exodus of white residents. 

A reign of terror ensued, targeting political opponents like would-be separatists on Bioko Island and dissidents inside the ruling party, and manifesting itself through public executions, kidnappings, exile killings, “disappearances,” and the murder of entire towns. By 1974, more than two-thirds of the initial 1968 Assembly members had vanished. 

Guinea Independence Guinea Independence

According to Fegley, the Macías administration killed at least 20,000 people and forced 100,000 others to flee the country, accounting for almost one-third of the overall population. In 1970, Macías established PUNT (Sole National Workers’ Party), prohibiting other political parties. Two years later, he declared himself president for life, leading the nation and party, commanding the army, and overseeing education, science, and culture. 

Macías separated himself from his colonial background by starting on an idiosyncratic “authenticity” agenda. This included an anti-Christian campaign, which culminated in the ban of the Roman Catholic Church in 1978 and the outlawing of the use of Christian names. Instead, he fostered his Fang group’s traditional Bwiti cult. 

Other characteristics included the promotion of traditional medicine, the closure of hospitals, the dismissal of six hundred instructors, and the prohibition of the term “intellectual” as referring to an alien polluter of African values. The initiative was accompanied by the now-customary excesses: in one instance, a secondary school principal was hanged and his body displayed after discovering a slashed portrait of the “President for Life” in his school entrance. 

In his final year, Macías abandoned traditional norms, probably inspired by Eastern-bloc contacts, declaring Equatorial Guinea as “an atheist state.” Meanwhile, the dictatorship itself was causing significant challenges to the once-thriving economy. Police assaults on Nigerian embassy staff in Malabo in 1975 led to the withdrawal of 35,000 Nigerian laborers from the Fernando Po cocoa plantations, replacing them with Fang laborers drafted from the mainland under the Compulsory Labor Act (1972), who lacked the necessary skills and failed to sustain production.

Despite blaming Spanish imperialism for his problems, Macías’ economic incompetence increased his country’s reliance on Spanish aid. By the late 1970s, Macías was rapidly losing his faculties and exhibiting signs of madness. Reports claimed that he communicated with those he had slain as if they were in the same room.

Guinea Independence

However, his authority was absolute, supported by family, and trusted Esangui clan members. He ruthlessly applied it to anyone who dared to complain, let alone criticize him. He overreached himself in June 1979 when he assassinated Teodoro Obiang, his nephew’s younger brother, for protesting his army pay arrears.

This threat to the tight circle of power prompted Obiang to rally numerous relatives and execute a successful coup. Macías was hanged at the end of September 1979, following a brief military trial. Some of the plotters were implicated in the previous regime’s atrocities. Obiang’s military government took swift action to improve relations with Spain and the Roman Catholic Church and was rewarded with a papal visit in February 1982. 

In August 1976, the Anti-Slavery Society protested the Macías regime’s atrocities, prompting the United Nations Human Rights Commission to launch an investigation. In March 1980, the United Nations Secretary-General approved the hiring of an expert to assist the Obiang government in restoring human rights. 

Despite lacking his uncle’s paranoia, Obiang’s human rights record has been far from perfect, with documented cases of extrajudicial murder, torture, and denial of basic rights to accused sons, compounded by the continued absence of an independent judiciary and the use of military tribunals to hear national security cases. For instance, they granted a defense attorney four hours to prepare a case for their alleged involvement in a coup attempt.

Other aspects of the old regime have persisted, such as the Esangui clan’s dominance of political structures and the ruling Equatorial Guinea Democratic Party’s (PDGE) absolute political and economic control. The breakdown of a one-party government in 1992 did not undermine its authority.

While the main opposition parties boycotted the 1993 elections, the 1999 elections saw short-term detentions of opposition candidates, the alleged removal of known opponents from the voter rolls, and reports that a lack of privacy in voting booths rendered the secret ballot, introduced for the first time in 1999, null and void.

Guinea Independence

Obiang received immunity from prosecution for suspected misdeeds committed before, during, and after his tenure in government prior to the emergence of multiparty politics, but this immunity has not yet faced challenges. He received 98% of the votes cast in the 1996 presidential election, despite allegations of fraud and intimidation.

However, in other respects, the 1990s were more favorable for Equatorial Guinea. The UN Human Rights Commission reported that the ruling class, not the people, reaped the benefits of significant offshore oil reserves brought into production in 1994. Obiang won the 2002 presidential election without any opposition, and Equatorial Guinea’s oil boom led to the highest economic growth rate in Africa.

Also Read: The Damaging Impact Of Colonialism on African Societies

Egypt Under Ottoman Rule

Egypt Under Ottoman Rule

Egypt Under Ottoman Rule: As soon as the Ottomans took over Egypt in 1517, they were in the middle of trade lines from Africa to India and the Mediterranean. Sulayman Pasha, who was viceroy of Egypt, sent the Ottoman ships from Suez to Aden in 1538 to govern trade in the Indian Ocean. 

But the Portuguese beat the Ottoman fleet in the Indian Ocean. After that, the Ottomans’ position in the Red Sea was mostly important for trade with Yemen and Africa. The Ottomans could do business with the African state of Abyssinia (now Ethiopia) via the port of Massawa on the Red Sea. When the Ottomans took over Nubia after 1538, they set up a border with Funj on the Nile. 

Through Funj and Darfur, trade with Africa was by far the most important. In the early 1600s, the leading families of these states converted to Islam, most likely so they could trade more with Ottoman Egypt. The Forty Days’ Road, also known as Darb al-Arba’in, was the main trade road from Sudan to Egypt. It went around the troubled areas of Nubia. This is the path that wagons from Darfur took from Qubayh to Asyut in Upper Egypt. 

Funj caravans took different ways from Qarri or Shandi to Ibrim. They met up and formed a single caravan, which continued to Isna in Upper Egypt. This line, which crosses the Nile at al-Damir, could also link to the Darb al-Arba’in at Salima. At Asyut and Isna, the Egyptian government imposed taxes on the caravans and sold some of their goods. The merchants proceeded to Cairo, where they once again taxed and sold the remaining goods in the markets.

Egypt Under Ottoman Rule

The wagon traders stayed in Cairo for six to eight months, buying goods to send to Sudanese Africa. The next group of Sudanese caravans completed the circle. In Libya, Cyrenaica was another way to get to Egypt. Caravans coming from Darfur also used this path. Additionally, there were lines that stretched from the east to the west. The lines extended from Funj’s Shandi to Suakin on the Red Sea, and from Shandi and Sennar to Darfur in the west.

The success of the caravan trade required a high level of organization among the participants. The Darfur caravan had at least 5,000 people and animals. As a result, the Darfur parade is established each year as a state-run enterprise. This allowed the sultans to collect taxes, buy slaves for their troops, and give luxury goods to those who followed them as a reward.

The government appears to have exerted less control over the Sennar caravans, as various caravans established themselves independently. But the Funj sultans also relied on customs duties to make money, as well as slaves for their armies. Traders acted as go-betweens for the sultans of Sudan and the viceroys of Egypt. Along with the Darfur caravan, there were 500 traders known as jallaba. They were a mixed-race group whose main members were from the Upper Nile Valley. 

There were a lot of people who came from Arab and Nubian families, like the Ja’ali, the Juhayna, and the Abdallabi. The jallaba paid for the caravans and the customs fees that the government wanted them to pay. Sennar, Funj’s capital, and many other Sudanese cities served as commercial hubs, trading goods and collecting customs. Smaller towns, such as Qarri and Shandi, allowed business.

The sultans lived in al-Fashir, which was the capital of Darfur. The jallaba, on the other hand, probably built a city that was successful at business. This was Qubayh, a town just north of the capital. The nomads in the Sahara and Nile Valley, who controlled the desert routes, also had to work with the trans-Saharan caravans. The nomads wanted customs duty because they protected the caravans, drove camels, and acted as guides. 

Egypt Under Ottoman Rule

The ‘Ababda watched over the Funj caravans that went to Upper Egypt. Each slave was worth three gold pieces, and each camel was worth one and a half. This happened in 1798. People believed that caravans traversing nomadic lands deserved protection. As a result, anyone could steal from a caravan that lacked the supervision of its designated guardians. Trade with Africa necessitated collaboration between merchants, state representatives in the north and south, and people on its edges.

Without a doubt, the slave trade was the most important. It’s possible that as many as 6,000 slaves passed through Darfur every year, and Funj delivered about 550 of them. It was okay to trade slaves. Capturing non-Muslim Africans, which is legal in Islam, provided the nomadic pastoralists with a valuable commodity to trade, enabling them to access markets. Slaves were typically non-Muslims who lived on Sudan’s southern borders. The Bar al-Ghazal area, the Nuba mountains, and the Shilluk and Dinka people were home to Darfur’s slaves.

In Funj, Abyssinia provided a large number of slaves. The Abyssinian slaves were mainly women. They sold for as much as sixty gold pieces in 1798. On average, slaves sold for thirty-five gold pieces in the Cairo markets in 1798, although eunuchs, aged between eight and ten years, sold for double or triple that amount. In the Darfur caravan, nearly four-fifths of the slaves sold were women. 

Cairo merchants and slave merchants in Istanbul purchased slaves, but the mamluk households of Cairo purchased many of them. In Isna and Asyut, the Egyptian rulers imposed a tax of four gold pieces on each imported slave. In Cairo, there were further taxes amounting to one and a half gold pieces. As with Darfur and Funj, the slave trade was a major source of income for Ottoman Egypt. 

Besides slaves, the caravans provided camels, gold, senna or cassia, tamarinds, gum, natron, alum, ebony, ostrich plumes, elephant tusks, tiger skins, and hippopotamus whips (kurbaj). As European demand grew in the eighteenth century, ivory and ostrich plumes became increasingly profitable. In 1798, the Egyptian authorities’ standard tax on a camel load was two gold pieces, but for camels carrying ostrich plumes, the rate was five and a half gold pieces.

In exchange, the southbound caravans carried Indian muslins, Syrian and Egyptian silks and cottons, and, in later times, inexpensive European cottons. European guns and swords, lead, gunpowder, and copper were all considered to be luxury goods. So were rice, sugar, perfumes, spices, horses, glass, silk, writing paper, coffee, and more. Cairo was the primary hub for selling African goods.

As tax farms, the Janissaries ran the Cairo customs houses in Old Cairo and Bulaq, which let them keep two-thirds of the money for themselves. Alexandria was the way that goods from Africa and Egypt got to Europe. Rosseta and Damietta sent ships to Asia Minor and Syria. The janissaries ran all of these establishments and kept most of the incoming money.

Europe sold ivory, ostrich feathers, gum, tamarind, senna, and gold. Istanbul received shipments of animal skins, gum, tamarinds, senna, and African slaves. Conversely, North Africa primarily traded slaves, making them the most valuable commodity. The Hijaz, an Ottoman region in the Arabian Peninsula, served as another marketplace for African goods.

Egypt Under Ottoman Rule

In this case, the yearly journey correlated with the trade. Every year, the African sultans send a payment to Mecca. The Darfur-based payment caravan met up with the main Egyptian convoy in Cairo. As the Sudanic Sultanates grew, so did the number of visitors. The pilgrims, like people from the Maghrib and West Africa, traded with others along the way.

Travelers followed the caravans to Egypt, but Suakin also provided a different way for travelers from Sudan and West Africa to get there. So, Ottoman trade with Africa followed a trend set during the Islamic conquest of Africa, when trade with Africa helped to convert African societies to Islam.

Also Read: The Great Mamluk Dynasty in Egypt (1250-1300)

Durban History

Durban History Durban History

Durban History: The coastal city of Durban, whose Zulu name is Tekweni, began as the British trading post of Port Natal in 1824. It grew into one of the most important commercial ports, industrial hubs, and vacation spots in southern Africa during the 20th century. The Natal Nguni-speaking people and the Zulu country to the north controlled the area around the city until the second half of the 1800s.

In 1497, Portuguese explorer Vasco De Gama said that the area had a great natural harbor and a high bluff. This prompted European merchants to come to the area to sell skins and ivory to African communities. Subsequently, the population of white people in Durban and its surrounding areas increased. This resulted in the formation of a strongly divided society by race and class in the cities.

Early in Durban’s history, relations on the frontier went up and down between the majority Nguni people, the Boer Voortrekkers, and the English traders. Francis Farewell and Henry Fynn started a new trading settlement in the first half of the 1800s, but African culture dominated it and the growing Zulu country pushed it to the background.

At first, Shaka kaSenzangakhona, the founder of the Zulu state, allowed the white people to live and trade in the area as long as they followed Zulu law. In the early 1820s, African law and customs ruled Port Natal society. This was due to the fact that white settlers had to adapt to the area and the predominantly African population, going so far as to work for Zulu kings as “clients.”

As Shaka strengthened his control over the area through a process known as the mfecane, Nguni chiefdoms that were not under Zulu control broke up. This caused waves of people to flee to Port Natal. The Zulu king saw the growing number of refugees as a possible threat, which made things worse between the settlement and the Zulu state. 

Durban History Durban History

Dingane faced two waves of white expansion after Shaka’s death in 1828: one from Port Natal and another from Boer Trekkers who had recently left the British-controlled Cape and moved into the area. The village grew over the next 20 years with help from Cape colonial and British imperial interference. 

In 1835, British missionary Allen Gardiner helped the Port Natal settlers and the Zulu live together in peace, but it wasn’t easy. He laid the groundwork for a planned, stable city and named it after Sir Benjamin D’Urban, who was governor of the Cape at the time. The Trekkers and traders from Durban formed an alliance against the Zulu, but this quickly turned into a war as the Boers and traders tried to push the Zulu back. 

After defeating the Zulu at the Ncome River in 1838, the Boers demonstrated that they were in charge of the area by establishing the Republic of Natalia. As a result, British troops took over Durban in 1842. Dick King, an early settler, then saved Durban from Boer attacks during the fight of Congella by riding to Grahamstown to get help, an act that has become legendary.

On May 31, 1844, Sir George Napier, the governor of the Cape, annexed Natal after pushing back the Boer forces. The British took this action due to their concerns that the Boer conflict with Africans was intensifying and might extend to the Cape, potentially handing over the strategic port to a foreign power.

White people controlled Durban for the second half of the 1800s as settler capitalism transformed the city and its surrounding area. In 1846, Sir Theophilus Shepstone, who was a diplomat for the native tribes, set up a system of separation that meant Africans could only own land in a few small areas. 

Once land suitable for sugar cane cultivation became available, white people flocked to Durban. Building train links to mining hubs in South Africa’s interior led to the growth of Durban’s port and merchant sectors, which in turn required more affordable labor.

Indian immigrants, who later established themselves as market gardeners and traders, and African migrant workers, who found jobs as dockworkers and housekeepers, met these needs. Even though there was a lot of violence in the area during the Anglo-Zulu War in 1879 and the Anglo-Boer War from 1899 to 1902, Durban did very well. 

Durban History Durban History

In fact, these fights only helped local businesses and made white racist attitudes stronger. Because there were more and more white settlers and the economy was growing, Britain gave Natal and its main city a responsible government in 1893. After the turn of the century, Durban became more organized and divided into racial groups. 

Local governments established the notorious Durban System as a way to control the production and sale of beer to African workers. Racism-based governance was detrimental to Africans residing in urban areas. The monopoly’s money paid for tighter control over Africans’ lives in small barracks.

Still, there were a lot of Africans and Indians living in the city, and John Dube, A. W. G. Champion, and Mohandas Gandhi were among the most famous opposition leaders in South Africa. Before the Natives Law Amendment Act of 1937 went into effect, African society took advantage of a short window of time in the law in the 1920s and early 1930s to buy land on the edges of the city. 

Africans set up unofficial townships there, which grew into important communities like the Chateau and Good Hope farms. However, by the end of the 1920s, race tensions and oppression had made Africans more determined to fight against the white state in the area. Africans went on a series of strikes in response to low pay, miserable working conditions, and unfair pass laws. Following a pass-burning protest in 1930, the dockworkers’ municipal beer hall boycott in 1929 marked the end of the strikes.

White officials brutally suppressed both groups. In the late 1930s, the Durban government tightened control over Africans in the city. They made the municipality a whites-only place and sent Africans to planned towns like KwaMashu, Umlazi, and Chesterville. As a result, the city government completely separated African people from everyone else and made them invisible outside of work.

During the apartheid years (1948–1991), problems between African workers got worse as the city’s business and population grew quickly. In 1950, 162,000 people lived there, with over half being African. By 1970, there were 395,000, and today there are more than 2.5 million. In the 1940s, an increase in migration to cities and factories exacerbated tensions between white people and Africans, as well as between Africans and the small Indian population.

In 1949, poor Africans couldn’t find a way to fight back against white society, so they attacked Indian traders they thought were taking advantage of them, which led to riots in the city. During the height of the Apartheid era, this was a turning point for Durban society, as each racial group tried to see itself in contrast to the others. In the 1970s, the city was the center of interest across the country as large-scale strikes led up to the “Durban Moment.” This was the time when South Africa’s opposition groups sped up political change. 

Durban History Durban History

Forcing casual African communities, like Cato Manor, to leave the city and “consolidate” in nearby parts of the KwaZulu homeland was what brought people together to fight apartheid. By 1984 and 1985, the white minority government was facing increasing opposition. African strikes got worse, and in Durban’s King’s Park rugby field, workers formed the Congress of South African Trade Unions. After that, Durban was often at the forefront of the fight against racism.

Also Read: How Colonial powers Used Radio To Spread Negative News About Africa

Douala History

Douala History

Douala History: Douala is Cameroon’s largest city and primary seaport. Douala sits on the tidal Wouri Estuary, a site of centuries-long trade with the West. From the 1600s to the 1800s, the Duala people, who established the city that bears their name, traded slaves and later palm products with Europeans. The abundance of crayfish in the Wouri Estuary led to its renaming as the Cameroons River. In 1884, the Duala chiefs made a deal with Germany, allowing Germany to settle in the area. The Duala town’s name inspired the new country’s name, Cameroon.

The Duala had four main parts at that point. On the south bank, there were the Bonaberi, the Bonambela (also called Akwa), and the Bonebela (also called Deido). On the north bank. The town was first called Kamerunstadt by the Germans. Later, the people who lived there before the arrival of the Europeans named it Douala.

The town was a hub for missionary work, schooling, and some modernization when the Germans were in charge. The Duala became like any other elite group on the West Coast. They got an education in the West and worked for Europeans in low-level jobs, but they also felt the weight of colonial power and fought against it. 

The most well-known protests against Duala were against a plan to separate them from other people. The plan involved moving the Duala, who resided on the southern shore of the river, to new areas a little farther inland. In 1914, the first part of the plan came into effect. The Bonadoo were mostly forced to leave their homes, and their leader, Paramount Chief Rudolf Duala Manga Bell, was put to death. 

However, an invading force, primarily composed of British soldiers, quickly took control of Douala when World War I broke out. The British ruled Douala primarily from September 1914 to April 1916. France took over it and most of Kamerun after that, making it the first city of the French-mandated Territory of Cameroun. The French did not take back the land they took from the Duala people along the southern shore of the river, even though they had been protesting and asking for self-government for years. 

Douala History

The land that was taken from the Bonadoos, especially the Bonanjo area, was used for buildings in Europe. Some Duala still lived there, as well as many others in Akwa, Deido, and Bonaberi, where many more wealthy people (clerks, teachers, etc.) built stone homes. In the 1930s, Bell Duala, expelled from his home, constructed these types of homes in Bali, near Bonanjo.

The Duala officially owned the land, but by the 1920s, most of the residents of the area they set aside for them, a little further inland, were Africans from other parts of Cameroon. Douala was the main port and business hub of French Cameroon before it became the capital city of Yaoundé in 1921. In particular, business offices were set up in Akwa. Africans, unable to construct modern homes, faced forced departure from Akwa in 1937, preserving their land rights.

In 1939, there were 34,002 people living there, including 17,871 Duala and 13,847 other Africans. Prior to that, the population may have primarily consisted of other Africans. Since the 1920s, a significant number of other Cameroonians (Bassas, Betis, and especially Bamilekes) have been arriving. This kept going and got worse after World War II, when the Free French took over French Cameroon and made Douala the city again for a few years. 

The city grew very quickly in the 1940s and 1950s because of economic growth and port facilities expansion. The Bamilekes were the first immigrants to the city, and they have stayed there. They quickly outnumbered the Duala and are now the biggest immigrant group in the city. The growing number of people living in cities around Douala was very active in nationalist politics in the 1940s and 1950s, as well as in times of political unrest like 1955 and 1960.

This happened again when multiparty politics came back in 1991. At the time, Douala was still a major center of government resistance. A bridge over the Wouri connected the main (southern) part of the city to Bonaberi in 1955. After the Germans, both railroads ended in Douala. One of them starts in Bonaberi. 

Douala History

The airport grew from a small one in the 1930s to become Cameroon’s main international airport, a role it still holds to this day. Douala has been Cameroon’s most important port for trade with other countries ever since it became independent. It handles more than 90% of the country’s trade, including some trade with Chad and the Central African Republic.

The port has expanded and remains a significant West Coast port, but it is currently facing issues such as river silting up and high fees. Douala is the economic capital of Cameroon. It is a busy place for all kinds of businesses, with many of them based in the Douala-Bassa area, which is east of the ancient city center. Between that neighborhood and the airport, the built-up area now includes parts that used to be rural. 

The city has kept growing and becoming more populous, with newcomers coming in all the time. People from other African countries have been coming to the U.S. for decades, and now there are big communities of them, mostly Nigerians. Bamilekes, reported to number 215,460 out of a total population of 458,426 in Douala in 1976, run most of the city’s small and medium-sized businesses. These businesses include taxi services, movie theaters, bars, hotels, import businesses, and shops of all kinds. 

The Duala are now a small group, but they still own a lot of land, and a lot of people speak their language. In wealthy areas like Bonanjo, some minorities live in comfortable conditions. Since the oil boom began in the 1970s, when the Douala region pumped some oil, these areas have become even wealthier. Various racial groups reside in densely populated areas in other districts, facilitated by numerous markets, shops, services, and prayer centers. There are a lot of Muslims in the city, but most of the people are Christians, and the Catholic cathedral in Bonanjo (1934) is an important landmark. 

Douala History

Douala is a busy, noisy, and crowded city that has been known for a long time for its cool spots and lively nightlife. However, the city faces numerous social issues, such as poor drainage due to the flat terrain and heavy rainfall, and a shortage of affordable housing for a large population. There are now more than a million people living in the city.

Also Read: African History: Think Africa Never Knew Its Own Past?

Cushite Era

Cushite Era

Australopithecus Afarensis, better known as “Lucy,” is the earliest known ancestor of humans. She lived in the Horn of Africa more than a million years ago, according to fossil studies. So, Northeast Africa, which includes the Horn of Africa, may have been the first place where people lived (Brandt 1992). Hominids may have been pushed out of the Horn of Africa around 125,000 years ago by early Homo humans. 

In northern Somalia, near the city of Hargeisa, a specific type of Stone Age industry with blades and flint tools began to form many years later, approximately 25,000 years ago (Brandt 1992, p. 29). However, the identity of the people who made these tools remains unknown. The people who lived in the Horn during the Stone Age, even in the later Stone Age, about 12,000 years ago, are also unknown. 

So, in its early stages, digging doesn’t tell us anything about specific racial groups. To summarize, we can only talk about early human groups in the area right now. We haven’t talked about Cushitic or Semitic groups yet. In the 20th century, a few searches in the north turned up information on “everything from Acheulian sites to Neolithic rock art.” 

According to radiocarbon dates from 18,000 to 40,000 years ago, some of the sites showed that the same people lived there over and over again (Brandt, Brook, and Gresham 1983, pp. 7–15). However, there is still less searching there than in West Africa and the Nile Valley. In the north, between Erigavo in the mountains and Las Koreh on the Gulf of Aden, there are hills and valleys. In 1980, a small-scale archaeological survey found “a series of caves and rock-shelters, many of which revealed surface scatters of Middle to Late Stone Age artifacts and fossilized bone” (Brandt, Brook, and Gresham 1983, p. 8). 

Rock shelters at Karin Hagin, a natural mountain pass about 70 kilometers southwest of Bosaso, have detailed rock paintings (Brandt, Brook, and Gresham 1983, p. 16). A type of cattle known as jamuusa, no longer found in Somalia but found in Egypt, is the most intriguing feature. There are also goats in the drawings. The style of these drawings is a lot like the rock art of Ethiopia and northeastern Africa in general, which is interesting. 

People who live in Northeast Africa and can now be found as far south as past the Equator in East Africa are called Cushites. In the past, they were mostly called Hamites. The words “Cushite” and “Hamite” come from the Christian Bible. However, the term “Hamite” has become less common. In their efforts to create a wide range of African races and subraces, European anthropologists have long fought about where the Cushites came from and have sometimes seen them as a mix of Caucasoid (white) immigrants from outside of Africa and dark-skinned (Nigeria) Africans. 

We have seen Cushites referred to as Black Caucasoids or Europoids, which is not appropriate (Seligman 1930). In the human range, it is not straightforward to tell where one person ends and another begins. Picking any number of traits to create human typologies means ignoring others. Also, these kinds of meanings are based on the personal preferences of the people who are making the lists. They also contradict the notion that all human groups have always interacted, beginning with those in close proximity and progressing to groups of varying sizes. In other words, every group of people is a mix of people.

Also, these kinds of groups don’t help us learn more about how people moved around in general, and they’ve led us to make wrong assumptions about where the Cushitic peoples of Africa and the greatest ancient civilization that grew out of Northeast Africa (ancient Egypt) came from. Since history books began keeping records of the area, which could be as early as 7,000 years ago, in the late Stone Age, the Cushites have lived in Northeast Africa. 
Still, not much is known about their past. Experts and archaeologists may have concentrated most of their work on ancient Egypt and the Nile Valley, failing to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire region and its inhabitants.

Linguistics reveals potential connections between the languages spoken by the Cushites and other languages. Therefore, we now understand that the Cushites’ languages share similarities with the Ancient Egyptian, Semitic, Chadic, and Berber languages, collectively referred to as the Afroasiatic “superfamily” of languages. Out of these, only the Semitic group has some native speakers in Asia. These people moved there from the African side of the Red Sea. 

Therefore, it’s likely that the ancestors of people who speak Afroasiatic languages first lived in northeastern Africa, mostly on the coasts of the Red Sea. They then spread out, with some Chadic groups heading into Western Sudan and some Semitic groups crossing the Bab el Mandab Straits into the Arabian Peninsula. After the Stone Age, around 6,000 years ago, people who lived in the lowlands of the Horn near the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden relied on keeping domesticated animals as their main source of income. 

In those early days, it rained more in the mountains and along the coast, which made raising animals easier (Brandt, Brook, and Gresham 1983, p. 10). New studies from northeastern and eastern Africa suggest that southern Egypt was raising and cultivating cattle, wheat, and barley more than 8,000 years ago. People first tamed sheep and goats about 7,500 years ago (Brandt 1992, p. 30).

People from different parts of the area learned from each other. For example, people who lived in the Nile Valley learned how to farm and handle cattle, while individuals who lived in the drier areas learned how to raise small animals like goats and sheep. At about the same time, groups living in the mountains or plateaus, like those in Ethiopia, started farming. From Egypt to Cape Guardui in what is now Somalia and up to the coast of the Red Sea during the time of the Egyptian culture, people lived in northeastern Africa. 

People generally say that the early Cushites were mostly herders, but it’s more likely that their jobs depended on the weather. If the area had a lot of water, they farmed, but if it was mostly dry, they raised sheep and goats as herders. Early Cushite societies also established castes, limiting their roles to specific tasks. For instance, only specific groups had permission to handle metal and leather.

For example, the warrior class was in charge of war, while the priest class was in charge of faith. This set of deals has been around for a long time. The early Cushites left behind remnants that warrant further study and research. Huge shrines in the Horn of Africa, for instance, serve as an ideal location for such research. The most famous of these are the huge graves and raised cairns in northern Somalia that stretch all the way to the Dawa River in southern Ethiopia, where the Oromo people’s ancestors lived. 

We haven’t found these massive graves in locations unrelated to early Cushitic settlements. The construction of these massive tombs implies a complex religion with numerous rituals and structures. This is even more true because we know that the Cushites believed in only one sky god, Waaq, prior to Islam and Christianity. The ahan ceremony, which involves creating and burying a grave, required a significant amount of labor from the people. Muslims still do this today.

Also Read: Kingdom Of Aksum: The Complete History Of A Great African Kingdom

History Of Comoros

History Of Comoros

History Of Comoros: One of the most important parts of the history of the Comoros Islands—Ngazidja (Grande Comore), Nzuani (Anjouan), Mwali (Mohéli), and Maoto (Mayotte)—is where they are located. The islands serve as stepping stones between northern Madagascar and northern Mozambique. They’re also the main way people moved between Africa and Madagascar, bringing their culture.

It’s possible that Indonesians who came to Madagascar used this route to get there. People have been moving from central Africa to Madagascar for hundreds of years. When Islam came to Africa in the tenth century, it was Islamic people who used this way to bring the cultures of the Swahili coast to northern Madagascar. 

The Bantu people of central Africa, the Islamic culture of the Swahili cities, and Madagascar’s culture all had an influence on the Comoros Islands’ welcoming attitude toward newcomers. Early towns and burial grounds on the islands show that there was a busy trade society as early as the tenth century. However, written records of trading towns like Domoni don’t appear until the fifteenth century. 

The town histories, written long after the events, clearly show that the leading families of the islands, like the rulers of Kilwa, had ties to Kilwa and claimed Shiraz as their home. In the 1600s, island traders did business with both the coast of East Africa and the towns in northern Madagascar. 

The islands primarily produced food, but they also built boats and probably traded people. Even though there are many stories that say otherwise, there is no proof that the Portuguese ever took over or settled the islands. However, boats from Mozambique Island would often make the short trip to get supplies. 

History Of Comoros

At the start of the 1600s, Portuguese was known as a useful language for dealing. Merchants from as far away as the Red Sea and the Gulf came to the islands to buy slaves, using Spanish money. When Dutch, English, and French traders came to the Comoros Islands, they became crucial in world events very quickly. 

Because the Portuguese controlled the coast of East Africa, strangers had to look for other places to stop. By the end of the 1600s, the Comoros Islands had become their main focus. During 1607 and 1608, Dutch ships attacked Mozambique Island from Mayotte Bay. French traders stopped to fix their boats and get food. 

The British East India Company most frequently used the islands as a post office, a place for sick people to stay until they recovered, and to restock their ships. The ships that visited the islands did not share the same sentiments. Grande Comore got a negative name for having hostile locals who didn’t want to do business with foreigners, along with a rough, unfriendly coastline and almost no fresh water. Anjouan and Mohéli, on the other hand, had fresh water, relatively safe anchorages, and people who were eager to do business. 

However, the coral reefs surrounding Mayotte and its narrow lagoon entrances made it difficult to reach. European ships often went to Mohéli and Anjouan, which is likely what made the ruling families richer. This was especially true for the ruler of Mutsammudu, the main port on Anjouan, who became sultan of the whole island and claimed to be in charge of all island affairs. 

Because of the constant need for fresh food and supplies for the ships, the island’s agricultural resources grew. They brought slaves to the islands to work on farms and later sell them, forming a plantation economy. Because of this, there was a cultural split between the mostly African people who lived on the farmland and the Islamic families who lived in the towns and had ties to East Africa, Arabia, and the Gulf.

History Of Comoros

As more commercial ships used the islands and the islands themselves became more successful, pirates started to pay more attention to them. Corsairs were patrolling the shipping lanes of the Indian Ocean and setting up bases in northeastern Madagascar. As a result, the Comoros Islands became more and more involved in their actions. Pirate ships went to Anjoan and Mohéli to get rid of stolen goods or slaves they had taken. They also used the Mayotte lagoon to get around British East India Company ships. 

Business ships and pirates engaged in numerous battles in the waters surrounding the Comoros Islands. The 1730s saw the capture or resignation of most pirates. Until the 1790s, the islands were not really in danger from outside forces. Ships from the British East India Company kept going to Anjouan and Mohéli. 

The British saw the Sultan of Mutsammudu as the sultan of the whole island, and he became the most important political person in these islands. The Sultan of Anjouan also gained more power over Mohéli, which had two old trade towns called Fomboni and Numa Choa. 

Europeans didn’t come to Grande Comore very often, but by the 18th century, the 20 towns on the island were already competing with each other. Each of these places had its own sultan. One of them was known as Sultan Thibé, which meant he was the most important and ceremonial sultan. 

History Of Comoros

That being said, Sultan Thibé didn’t really have any power, and the feuding families that ran the towns, some of which were only a few miles apart, kept fighting. In the second half of the 1800s, the French started to build a trade route for slaves from Madagascar and eastern Africa to their sugar farms in Ile-de-France and Ile de Bourbon. 

These islands were once again a major place to buy and sell slaves. However, in the 1790s, Sakalava and Betsimisaraka raiders from northern Madagascar found the islands to be an easy target for their attacks. The slave trade was bad for the people who lived there.

Also Read: Who Are The Oromo People?