The Chadic Language and It’s People

Chadic Languages and it’s people. Chad has had a lot of different ethnic groups for a long time, which makes it hard to separate their different stories. Because of its location and the fact that it has features like Lake Chad that make it a good place to live, people have been moving to and through Chad from all over Africa and beyond since at least 5000 BCE.

So, this area has been ruled by a lot of different empires, and each of them brought something of their culture, ethnicity, or language with them. During this time, the most powerful empires in the Lake Chad area were those of Kanem and, for a time, its neighbor Bornu. Their stories, though, became so intertwined that people often talk about Kanem-Bornu as a single thing. It was founded in the ninth century and lasted in a smaller form until the nineteenth century.

At first, it was home to a mix of nomadic tribes without cities. The kingdom was spread across a large part of the Sahara, which gave it access to trade routes that went across the Sahara. Over time, the tribes became more alike, especially as more and more Muslim Kanuri moved in starting in the eleventh century. This process was completed when their own language took the place of the different Teda-Daza languages that were already spoken in the area.

The Fula (Fulani, Fulbe) were originally pastoral nomads, but as their power and size grew, they became the largest group of pastoral nomads in the world and one of the largest Muslim groups in Africa. As some of the first to convert to Islam, they helped it spread across the continent while also increasing their own power.After a series of religious wars, the Fula were in charge of an empire that went from Lake Chad to the Niger Bend and back to their original home in Lower Senegal.

Soon after the start of the 1800s, the empire began to fall apart. The Bagirmi (Barma) lived in a state that their first king, Dala Birni, set up in the area southeast of Lake Chad in 1522. By the beginning of the 17th century, it had converted to Islam and served as a buffer between Bornu to the northwest and Wadai to the northeast. It had to pay tribute to both, and Bornu finally took it over at the beginning of the seventeenth century. It stayed a vassal of Bornu until the beginning of the nineteenth century.

Over the years, the Bagirmi and other nearby tribes, especially the Fula, Kanemba, Sara, and Massa, have become more alike. Before the late 1300s, when city-states started to form, the first Hausa communities were set up in the 11th century. With the spread of Islam in the middle of the fourteenth century, which started in the well-off walled cities of the area, like Kano and Katsina, their numbers grew dramatically, and they moved into more of the Kanem-Bornu empire and, in the sixteenth century, the Songhai empire.

The last attempt led to the creation of the Fula empire and the coming together of the two groups, which was led spiritually at first by Usman dan Folio. The Kanemba (also called Kanembu, Kanuri, Borno, and Bornu) started building the kingdom of Kanem in the ninth century. The royal family was originally Arabic, but at the end of the eleventh century, they converted to Islam. At the same time, they spread their power from Kano to Western Sudan. In the middle of the 13th century, they moved out of Chad and into Bornu, which became their capital in the 14th century.

At the end of the fifteenth century, when it became the Kanem-Bornu empire, the kingdom’s power grew even more. It was at its highest point by the end of the 17th century, then stayed the same for another hundred years before starting to go down in the 18th century. Tradition says that Kotoko people are related to the Sao, a race of giants who used to live south of Lake Chad, between the northern parts of Nigeria and Cameroon. Around the year 800 CE, the Sao people, whose history goes back to 3000 BCE, arrived in the Lake Chad area.

In the 15th century, the Kotoko rose to power when they left their home country and moved down the Rivers Logone and Chari to rule a large part of northern Nigeria and Cameroon. Their conversion to Islam happened pretty late, and they kept a lot of what they believed before they became Muslims.

The Maba, who speak the Nilo-Saharan language of Bora Mabang, are another ethnic group that is almost entirely Muslim and used to be the most powerful group in the Wadai kingdom.

Maybe because of this past glory, the Maba never did manual labor because they thought of themselves as a noble class. Their social structure was similar to that of the Fula, and they were closely related to the Moussei (Moussey) people from the north and center of the country.

The Sara (Kirdi), who live mostly in the south of the country, are Nilotic people who are thought to have come in the 1600s. From the beginning, their northern neighbors, especially the Fula, attacked them violently to take slaves. As a result, they moved further and further south. Even though the slavers lost a lot of people, they were still the largest group of people in Chad.

The Teda (Tebu, Tibbou, Toubbou) are made up of about 40 clans and have always lived a nomadic or seminomadic life. The Teda were some of the first people to convert to Islam. Over the years, they were known as livestock raiders when they weren’t making money by charging travelers who came across the long desert tracks they patrolled for protection. When Ottoman authorities moved into the area, they cut back on their activities. This forced them to grow dates on a small scale in the Tibesti region.

The Bilala (Bulala), whose culture is Arabic and who say they all come from the same ancestor, Bilal, are the last group to be mentioned (Balal). Even after they became Muslim, they still held on to some of their old beliefs and did some farming along with it.

Also Read: JUKUN People Of The Kwararafa Kingdom: The Amazing History Of The Benue Valley Peoples

Who was Leo Africanus

Even though this Moroccan traveler is well-known, not much is known about his life. All of the details about his life before he got to Rome come from the few autobiographical notes in his geographical work that are still around. Even when Leo Africanus was in Italy, he didn’t do much that was written down at the time. Italian reports from the Barbary Coast suggest that Leo Africanus did not exist and that his description of Africa was written by a Venetian ghostwriter.

This view is too strict, but it does have some truth to it. Leo Africanus is a bit of a mythical figure, and much of what we think we know about his life comes from what his fans have made up. He was born in the city of Granada. It’s not clear when it happened, but it happened after the city gave itself up to the Spanish in 1492. His parents, on the other hand, moved quickly to Morocco. They moved to Fez, where their son went to school and did well.

People say that Leo Africanus went to the eastern Mediterranean on the first of his great trips in 1507 and 1508. We don’t know why he went on this trip, and we don’t even know for sure that he went on it. Leo, who was sixteen years old at the time, went to Timbuktu with one of his uncles on a diplomatic mission during the winter of 1509–1510.

He is said to have gone back to Timbuktu two years later, but this time for personal reasons. From Timbuktu, he may have gone to other parts of Sudanic Africa, then to Egypt, and then back to Fez, where he lived, in 1514. After that, Leo Africanus chose to live as a wanderer. During his adventures in Morocco, he was often with a sharif who was trying to overthrow the Wattasid sultan of Fez.

This person might have been Ahmad al-Araj, the founder of the Sadid dynasty. In 1511, he took control of southern Morocco and fought against the Portuguese, which made him very popular. Leo’s travels took him from Morocco to Algeria and Tunisia. He also went to Constantinople, which may have been his second time there. In the spring of 1517, he went to Rosetta, where he saw Egypt being taken over by the Ottomans.

He then traveled to Arabia. In June 1518, Leo was on his way back to Tunis, possibly from a pilgrimage to Mecca, when he was captured by Christian corsairs near the island of Crete. People thought that Leo was caught near the island of Djerba, off the coast of Tunisia, for a long time, but new research by Dietrich Rauchenberger has shown that this is not likely. Leo was first taken to Rhodes, but he was soon sent to Rome, where he met Pope Leo X Medici (1513–1521), who was planning a crusade to northern Africa.

From the pope’s point of view, the arrival of a learned Moor who was willing to work with him and his advisors and give them accurate information about northern Africa was like a gift from heaven. He was freed and given money when he got to Rome. He also became a Christian and was baptized at St. Peter’s on January 6, 1520. His noble patron gave him the name Johannes Leo de Medicis, or Giovanni Leone in Italian, but the man preferred to call himself Yuhanna ‘l-Asad al-Gharnati in Arabic. In 1522, Leo Africanus left Rome and went to Bologna.

This probably happened because the new pope, Hadrian VI (1522–1523), who had been the imperial viceroy of Spain, was worried about a converted Morisco being at the papal court. The plague, which killed almost half of Rome’s population by the end of 1523, was likely another reason. While he was in Bologna, he put together a medical vocabulary in Arabic, Hebrew, and Latin. Only the Arabic part of this has been kept. This manuscript, which is now kept at the Escorial library, has Leo’s handwriting on it.

It is one of the few places where his original Arabic name, al-Hasan b. Muhammad al-Wazzan, can still be found. Early in 1526, Africanus moved back to Rome, where he lived under the protection of the new Medici Pope Clement VII (1523–1534). We know nothing for sure about his last years. Johann Albrecht von Widmanstetter, who went to Italy in 1527 to study Oriental languages, said that the man, whom he called Leo Eliberitanus, had left Rome just before the city was sacked in May of that year.

After that, he moved to Tunis, where he is thought to have died around 1550. This information can be trusted because Widmanstetter moved in circles where people remembered Leo Africanus well. But since Leo had given up on Christianity, he probably didn’t want to see the Spanish take over Tunis in 1535. With this information in mind, Raymond Mauny’s idea that Leo Africanus spent the rest of his life in Morocco makes sense. Africanus said that he finished his most important work on African geography on March 10, 1526, after he got back to Rome.

People used to think that Leo wrote his work first in Arabic and then translated it into Italian. Paul Colomiés said that Leo’s original manuscript belonged to the Italian humanist Gian Vincenzo Pinelli (1535–1601), whose books make up most of the Bibliotheca Ambrosiana in Milan. This idea was based on that claim. The Ambrosiana has an anonymous Arabic manuscript that describes Africa.

It was not written by Leo Africanus, though. Now, most people think that Leo wrote his work directly in a kind of messed-up Italian, though he almost certainly used Arabic notes he made while traveling. In 1931, the Biblioteca Nazionale in Rome was surprised to find a handwritten Italian version of Leo’s work on geography. They bought it. The style of this manuscript, called Cosmographia & Geographia de Affrica, is very different from that of the Italian printed version.

However, the manuscript is a clear copy of Leo’s original text, which his Italian publisher later used. The manuscript hasn’t been published yet, except for the parts and pieces about the Sahara and Sudanic Africa that Rauchenberger published with German translations. Leo’s geography work, Delle descrittione dell’ Africa, was published in Venice in 1550. It was included in the first volume of Delle navigationi et viaggi, a book of travels and discoveries put together by Giovanni Battista Ramusio (1485–1557).

No one knows when or how Ramusio got Leo’s original manuscript. The collection was a hit right away, and many copies had to be printed again. After that, Leo’s text was translated into the main European languages, so it could be read by an ever-growing number of people. In 1556, it came out in French and Latin. In 1600, it came out in English, and in 1665, it came out in Dutch. But these translations were not very good because they were cut short without reason and had many mistakes. The most popular version, which was written in Latin, has a lot of serious mistakes in it.

More translations of Leo’s text have been made in the modern era. In 1805, a German version came out. In 1896, an updated English version based on the first translation came out, and between 1896 and 1898, an updated French version came out. In 1956, a new, scholarly, annotated French translation was released. It was based on Ramusio’s printed text and was only slightly different from the Italian manuscript version. In Morocco, an Arabic version of the 1956 French edition came out in 1982.

One reason Leo’s work was so well known was that there were not many other sources on African geography. The Portuguese had a good idea of where the coasts of Africa were, but they couldn’t get into the interior because the people there fought back and there were deadly diseases there. Also, most of the Portuguese accounts of what they found in Africa were never printed. A modern reader said that Leo Africanus “discovered” a new world for Europeans, similar to how Columbus “discovered” America.

Some people even think that Shakespeare based Othello on Leo Africanus. The Descrittione was the most important book about Africa’s geography in Europe until the early 1800s, when explorers brought more accurate information about the Niger and the areas around it. In writing about the history of western Africa, Leo’s influence lasted much longer, up until the early 1900s. Leo’s Descrittione has been rightly called the last thing that Islamic learning gave to European culture. In spite of its name, the Descrittione is not a full explanation of the geography of Africa.

The focus is on the Barbary Coast, especially Morocco, which is now Leo’s home country. It takes as much space to talk about the city of Fez as it does to talk about Tunisia and Libya together. As for the rest of the continent, Leo only knew about Sudanic Africa. He didn’t write anything about the Guinea Coast, the Congo, or Christian Ethiopia, which Europeans knew about from Portuguese reports at the time.

The part about Sudanic Africa is the shortest, and there is no evidence that it was based on the author’s own experiences. Leo could have learned everything he needed to know from Arab merchants and West African pilgrims he met while traveling in northern Africa. Leo’s view of Sudanic Africa is very Islamic, and he said that black people were barbaric savages until the Muslim Berbers of the Sahara conquered and educated them in the 12th century. He also saw Timbuktu as the center of the gold trade in West Africa.

In the hands of his later copyists in Europe, this picture became a vision of an African Zipangu. This had a big effect on the beginning of the exploration of West Africa’s interior at the end of the 18th century. Internal references show that Leo planned to add two more volumes to his Descrittione, one about Europe and the other about the Middle East. This plan didn’t work out. He also wrote, or at least planned to write, a book about the Islamic religion and one about the history of North Africa.

Neither of these two works has been found, even if he did finish them. Leo also wrote a book about the lives of Islamic and Jewish philosophers. He finished this book in Rome in 1527. In 1664, Johann Heinrich Hottinger published a Latin version of this work in Zürich with the title Libellus de viris quibusdam illustribus apud Arabes. In 1726, J.A. Fabricius published it in Hamburg with the title Libellus de viris quibusdam illustribus apud Arabes. Leo also translated the Epistles of St. Paul into Arabic, and a copy of this is now kept at the Biblioteca Estense in Modena.

Also Read: The Richest Man In Africa’s History: Mansa Musa Reign And Great The Mali Empire

The Jukun People

Who are the Jukun People Of Kwararafa? Numerous ethnic groups call the Nigerian Middle Belt their home, although the Nupe, Baruba, Idoma, Tiv, Ebira, Igala, Chamba, and Jukun are among the most well-known of these communities. The most mysterious of these factions is the Jukun, who are said to have been involved in the founding of the mighty but fleeting state of Kwararafa.

Because of its reign of terror over the Hausa states and Borno region during the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries, Kwararafa attained a prominent place in the annals of Nigerian history. However, the association of the Jukun with the Kwararafa has been called into question. This is mostly due to the fact that the term “kwararafa” signifies nothing to modern-day Jukun, who have almost no memory of their apparently violent history.

The preponderance of evidence suggests that the Islamic peoples of the Central Sudan used the name kwararafa as a generic phrase to refer to the non-Muslim peoples from the south. Kwararafa ancestry is claimed by more than a dozen different ethnic groups in modern-day Nigeria, which are dispersed across a large region in the country’s north and center. It’s possible that this indicates that Kwararafa was a confederacy.

The Hausa-speaking Kutumbawa-Abakwariga, along with the Arago, Kalam, Gwana, Pindiga, Kona, Kundi, and Jukun, were the most important members of this group. The location of the capital, much like the membership of the confederacy, appears to have oscillated with the vicissitudes of the confederacy and the location of the particular group or groups that were dominant in it. This was the case even though the site of the capital never changed.

The Confederacy was an organization that was formed for particular reasons, such as defense and trade; however, it did not have a clearly defined frontier or a permanent geographical location; it did not establish enduring hegemony over the peoples that it conquered; and it ceased to exist once those particular goals had been accomplished. They did not leave any histories or chronicles behind them.

Because of this, the majority of what we know about them now comes from the documents kept by their adversaries. The reconstruction presented here is based on the innovative use of other sources, such as the chronicles of successor states and peoples, as well as the historical analysis of spirit masquerades and shrines, as well as political and biological totems. This was done in order to create a more accurate picture of what happened. Studies conducted by J. B. Webster (1976, 1993) and others have shown that the history of the Kwararafan people may be broken down into four distinct phases.

The first one started in the year 1000 when it was established at Santolo, which is located on the southern bank of the Hadeija River and lies east of Lake Chad. By the year 1380, the capital of the confederacy had relocated to Tagara, which is located to the north of the junction of the Gongola and Hawal rivers. Kwararafa, which was governed by the Kutumbawa dynasty, was in direct opposition and competition with the Hausa Habe states, most notably Kano, for the management of Saharan trade.

Conflicts between commercial interests and religious tenets erupted almost immediately as tensions rose. In these early clashes, it seemed as though the Haberland states had the upper hand. Korau, the monarch of Katsina at the time, is said to have conducted war against the Kwararafa in the year 1260, according to a Katsina account. A century later, it was the turn of Kano, whose kings Yaji (1349–1385) and Kanajegi (1390–1410) successfully coerced the Kwararafa to submit to a yearly tributary tribute that comprised, among other things, 200 slaves. This payment was required of them in order to avoid incurring Kano’s wrath.

In addition, because Queen Amina of Zaria beat the Kwararafa in battle, they were forced to pay tribute to Zaria for the majority of the fifteenth century. This initial chapter of Kwararafan history came to a dramatic and abrupt end when their disastrous loss at the hands of Bornu occurred between around 1462 and 1495. After that, the government relocated the capital to Biepi, which is located on the southeastern side of the Benue River.

In the meantime, refugees escaping from the forces of Islam in the northern nations entered the Kwararafa region, transforming the confederacy into a bulwark of traditionalist beliefs and practices. This second phase, which came to an end with the succession of King Kenjo in approximately 1610, was a prosperous one due to the nation’s active participation in the commerce of both the Sahara and the Atlantic.

They were able to get access to European goods on the coast thanks to their control of the salt supply in the Benue Valley. In exchange for horses to bolster their military and slaves to gain access to European goods on the coast, they sold the crucial but limited commodity of salt. Kwararafa became synonymous with the port city of Calabar, which is located on the Atlantic coast. The formation of a robust cavalry army was made possible by an increase in wealth as well as an increase in the population.

This would, over the course of the next two centuries (sometime between 1610 and 1790), enable the Kwararafa to not only preserve its independence but also inflict a series of spectacular defeats on the Hausa and Kanuri states as well as competitors to the north. Zaria was the first city to have its status changed to that of a tributary. Between the years 1582 and 1703, Kano was subject to a number of assaults, during which its military stood by helplessly as a fresh and revitalized Kwararafan army wreaked havoc in the center of the Hausa homeland.

Even though it is located further to the north, Katsina was nonetheless a victim of the Kwararafan’s atrocities. Kwararafa was at the height of its strength by the year 1680, when it once again swept across the Hausa region and its army reached the gate of Ngazargamu, the capital of the Borno empire, which it sacked and put the monarch to death. During this time, Kwararafa was at the height of its dominance. However, the Borno quickly regrouped, and the Kwararafan were defeated as a result.

The latter part of this age of conquest was also the time when Kwararafan history and Jukun history first started to become more intertwined with one another. Kwararafa, which was now located in the Benue Valley, began to be invaded by waves of Jukun people shortly after the valley’s settlement, and the Jukun quickly rose to become the most powerful ethnic group in the area. Kwararafa’s decline can be attributed to a combination of factors, including internal strife and ongoing attacks from the outside, as well as natural calamities such as drought.

It is generally accepted that Adi Matswen was the final king of the Kwararafa, and the Chamba were able to drive him out of his capital city of Uka. He made his escape upstream on the Benue River and established a new capital at Wuse. By the year 1820, a Jukun dynasty that had its stronghold in Wukari, which is located south of the Benue River, had gained control of the remnants of the Kwararafa state.

Following the completion of this shift, the militaristic state of Kwararafa was no longer in existence. The military customs of Kwararafa were not passed down to the Jukun, but they did inherit the political power of Kwararafa. The once-distant confederacy had reorganized itself into the unified kingdom of Wukari, which was ruled by the Jukun. Kwararafa, under the rule of the Jukun, ceased to be a warrior state; extant accounts portray the new state as a pacifist and religious one.

The new state was made up of a collection of peace-loving people who were solely and strictly devoted to the maintenance of their innumerable religious cults and the veneration of their sacred kings. These were people whose prestige and continuing legitimacy depended on their successful performance of their main ritual function.

Also Read: Oba Ewuare: Great Benin Empire Trade with the Portuguese

History Of Osei Tutu

As the monarch of Asante from 1701 through 1717, Osei Tutu is widely regarded as one of the most influential rulers in the country’s history. He successfully completed the lengthy process of nation-building started by Twum and Antwi, Asante’s first two rulers.Osei Tutu provided the Asante with a capital, a constitution, a military machine that ensured a lengthy period of political stability, and a unifying element in the form of the Golden Stool.

His companion and lieutenant, Okomfo Anokye, was instrumental in helping him accomplish these goals. The fact that Osei Tutu’s passing is commemorated in the Asante great oath, known as memeneda kromante, is a testament to both his brilliance and the role he played in the growth of the Asante country. Tradition from the early Asante people describes Osei Tutu’s sojourn in Denkyira and later in Akwapim. It was in Akwapim that he met and became friends with Okomfo Anokye, a native of Awukugua.

Okomfo Anokye went on to become Osei Tutu’s most trusted counselor and lieutenant. Tradition from the early Asante people describes Osei Tutu. Not only did Osei Tutu’s stay in Denkyira and Akwamu give him an introduction to the politics of the two great powers of the day, but it also drove home for him the significance of the Atlantic trade in firearms down the coast.

After the passing of his uncle, Obiri Yeboa, Osei Tutu, with the assistance and support of Okomfo Anokye, returned to Asante and made significant contributions to the growth of Asante in five main ways: he completed the union of Akan states that were within a twenty-five mile radius of Kumasi; he provided the Asante union with a new capital, Kumasi; he introduced a new military organization; and he expanded the boundaries of Asante.

Before Osei Tutu became the monarch of Asante, the components necessary for a union were already in place. With the exception of the chief of Mampon, all of the chiefs of the original Amantoo, which served as the core of the Asante empire, were members of the Oyoko clan. As a result, the concept of brotherhood that is consistent with the Akan family system was amplified. Osei Tutu took advantage of this connection, and by appealing to the Amantoo chiefs’ shared anxieties and hopes, he was able to persuade them to acknowledge the Golden Stool as the heart, mind, and spirit of the Asante nation.

To this day, the Golden Stool continues to serve as a representation of Asante national identity. It was believed that the spirit of the Asante nation could be found within the Golden Stool, which was said to have been conjured from the sky by Okomfo Anokye. The smart statesmanship of Osei Tutu and Okomfo Anokye, along with their manipulation of the religious beliefs of the Asante people, allowed them to instill a sense of collective destiny in the consciousness of the nation.

Because of this, the numerous clans were connected to one another through a spiritual and religious relationship, the physical expression of which was embodied by the Golden Stool, which was shown during celebrations. In addition, the songs and recitals associated with the traditional history of Asante were framed in ways that were designed to develop and maintain the idea of a community of beginnings and a shared collective destiny.

The Asante army, the Golden Stool, the Odwira Festival, and the Asante Constitution were, however, the most powerful of these instruments. Following the formation of the union, Osei Tutu and Okomfo Anokye were certain that the Asante state should endure. This was especially the case considering that Osei Tutu was aware of the internal strife that plagued Akwamu and Denkyira during his time there.

In order to achieve this goal, a variety of state-building tools—some of which were inherited and some of which were developed—were utilized to ensure this unity. The city of Kwaman was renamed Kumasi after Osei Tutu after he moved the capital there. This was accomplished through the use of diplomacy and religious rites that were intended to show that the ancestor spirits approved of the plan.

In addition to this, Osei Tutu is credited with drafting a constitution for the country of Asante. This established the order of authority within the administrative structure of the Asante nation. The Asantehene, who served as both the political and spiritual leader of Kumasi, was positioned at the very top of the edifice.

The leaders of the Amantoo states served as subordinates to the Asantehene. These chiefs gave up the right to declare war, participated in the yearly Odwira celebration, swore an oath of allegiance to the Asantehene, contributed troops during times of war or emergency, and pledged their allegiance to the Asantehene. In addition to this, they acknowledged the court of the Asantehene as the court of appeal and contributed to the apeatuo, which is a national charge that is imposed for certain tasks.

On the other hand, the Amanhene was able to have a role in the development of foreign policy and held the rights to lands that were conquered prior to the formation of the union. Osei Tutu is credited with crystallizing the spirit of the aristocratic ranks by employing various symbols and emblems in line with the levels of clan-family positions and dignities of the many chiefs. This helped Osei Tutu to distinguish between the various degrees of clan-family positions. As a result, Dwaben, Kumawu, Bekwae, and Mampon were placed on a level that was nearly equivalent to that of the Asanthene himself.

The efficient use of the Asante in rapid territorial expansion demonstrates the presence of a well-established military organization system. A body of scouts known as the nkwansrafo, an advance guard known as the twafo, a main body known as the adonten, a personal bodyguard known as the gyase, a rear-guard known as the kyidom, and left (benkum) and right (nifa) wings, respectively, made up the Asante national army. Asante’s military victories can be attributed, in part, to the successful coordination of these components. Each individual state that makes up the Union (Amantoo) was given a specific location inside the military configuration.

The Mamponghehe served as the commander-in-chief, the Essumengyahene commanded the left wing, and the Krontihene commanded the right wing. The Krontihene was in charge of the defense of the capital. Osei Tutu was able to achieve a lethal level of success through the utilization of this capable military organization. Between the years 1699 and 1701, he fought and vanquished Denkyira, and he also conquered Akyem and Offinso.

He avenged the Asante for their loss at the hands of the Dormaa. He brought previously captured states into the union, including Amakom, Tafo, and Ofinso, among others. Amankwa Tia led the Asante warriors that made the crossing of the Pra and began their campaign in the Begho region. Osei Tutu passed away in the year 1717 while engaged in combat with the Akyem, who had not yet been completely subjugated. Osei Tutu was successful in completing the mission of expanding the empire and constructing an efficient administrative structure by the time his reign came to an end. Both of these endeavors had been started by Osei Tutu’s predecessor.

Also Read: Oba Ewuare: Great Benin Empire Trade with the Portuguese

Who Was Akhenaten?

Who Was Akhenaten? During his reign, which spanned about 1360–1343 BCE, Akhenaten was king of the Eighteenth Egyptian Dynasty. One of Akhenaten’s most noteworthy achievements was his brief attempt to consolidate all of Egypt’s gods into a single entity known as the Aten, which was essentially the physical incarnation of the sun. It is currently believed that the foundation of the religion was Amenhotep III’s deification as the “living Aten” while he was still alive.

This is because Amenhotep III was Akhenaten’s father. It is safe to say that the entire religion of the Aten revolved around the royal family, and the king was the only person who could worship the god because he was the god’s earthly representative. Amenhotep was Akhenaten’s given name at birth, and he retained that name throughout the first five years of his reign as the fourth monarch to have that name. During this time, he was known as Akhenaten.

It is probable that up to the first twelve years of his reign were spent reigning jointly with his father, with Egypt’s primary religious capital staying at Thebes. During this time, it is likely that Thebes was the location of the capital city. Behind the temple of Amun-Re of Karnak, which is considered to be the king of the gods, a huge temple dedicated to Aten was constructed here. However, during the fourth year of his reign, Amenhotep IV made the decision to look for a special cult center for the Aten.

He founded a new city called Akhetaten (modern Tell el-Amarna), which was located approximately in the middle of the distance between Thebes and Memphis, the civil capital. While he was doing this, he also changed his name from Amenhotep, which meant “Amun is satisfied,” to Akhenaten, which meant “Effective Spirit of the Aten.” It is commonly hypothesized that these shifts toward a more democratic form of religion were a reaction against the growing dominance of the Amun priesthood, with a move toward a more egalitarian religious structure.

On the other hand, this is, at best, an oversimplification and, at worst, an entirely erroneous representation of the situation. The close ties that existed between the monarch and the Aten, in particular if the latter was, for all intents and purposes, Amenhotep III, served to significantly bolster the position of the royal household at the epicenter of both political and religious authority in ancient Egypt.

However, the heavenly king had always played an important role, and one should be wary of drawing too many conclusions about the reasons why ancient people did the things they did because those records have not remained. The fact that the object of devotion in private household shrines at Amarna was a single stela depicting the royal family in the act of adoration is illustrative of the purportedly democratic nature of the cult.

This is a fact that should not be overlooked. This provides a strong suggestion that, at the absolute best, an average person’s access to God is restricted. It is known that Akhenaten had two wives. The elder of the two was Nefertiti, and while nothing is known about her background, it is possible that she was the daughter of an Egyptian general named Ay.

There was some speculation that she was a princess from the state of Mitanni, which is located in northern Syria, and that she had joined the king’s harem as part of a diplomatic union; however, this theory has almost totally been debunked at this point. Kiya was the younger of the two wives; her background is just as mysterious, and it is not out of the question to assume that she was the Mitannian lady.

Meryetaten, Meketaten, Ankhesenpaaten, Neferneferuatentasherit, Neferneferure, and Setpenre are the six known offspring that Nefertiti bore to her husband. All of these children were daughters. In addition, there is mention of a son by the name of Tutankhuaten in an inscription that was found in Amarna. On the other hand, nothing is known about his mother. On the east bank of the Nile, on a site that had never been inhabited before, the city of Akhetaten was established.

The palace, temples, and government offices were located in the central city, which was separated from the private residential suburbs that spread outward from it in all directions. The royal home was located at the northernmost tip of the region. The city borders, which were marked by a string of fifteen enormous boundary stelae, included not just the central business district but also a sizable portion of the west bank’s farmland.

The royal cemetery was located at the end of a five-kilometer-long wadi that ran into the eastern desert. The tomb chapels of the nobles were cut into the eastern cliffs behind the city. Since the 1890s, excavation work has been carried out at the site of the city, most frequently by teams from Germany and the United Kingdom. A significant number of clay tablets written in Mesopotamian cuneiform script were discovered at the site.

These tablets indicate communications received from other great countries as well as from vassals. It has been argued that these factors contributed to a loss of Egyptian dominance in Syria and Palestine during the reign of Akhenaten, which was made worse by the king’s deliberate neglect of the region. Because there were issues with the arranging of many of the letters and because this is the only archive of its kind that is still in existence and is known to have come from Egypt, one must exercise caution when reaching such conclusions.

The fact that ancient beliefs regarding Akhenaten’s claimed pacifism are problematic due to the survival of fragments depicting the king (and the queen) smiting Egypt’s enemies also makes old views difficult. The so-called “Hymn to the Aten,” which is engraved in a number of private tomb chapels, provides an excellent synopsis of the beliefs of the Aten religion. It has been compared to some of the Hebrew Psalms in terms of both its universalist stance and its form.

There is no evidence to suggest that these two writings are connected in any direct way; rather, they are expressions of a cultural milieu that was prevalent throughout the Near East throughout the latter part of the Bronze Age. Meketaten, Akhenaten’s daughter, passed away not long after the end of her father’s twelfth year as king, which may have been the same year that he took sole control of Egypt after Amenhotep III was put to death.

In addition to this, the monarch adopted a new coronet that was at first known as Smenkhkare and was eventually renamed Neferneferuaten. It has been hypothesized that one or both of these names refer to Nefertiti in her capacity as a female king. This is based on the fact that records of Nefertiti vanished about the same time. However, there is unmistakable proof that the name Smenkhkare was given to a man who was married to Princess Meryetaten.

In addition, a collection of inscriptions displaying a transitional titulary, which is halfway between those associated with the names Smenkhkare and Neferneferuaten, indicates that we actually have a single individual (probably Akhenaten’s eldest son) who subsequently changed his name. Smenkhkare/Neferneferuaten seems to have died before Akhenaten. Akhenaten’s assault on polytheistic monuments, which included the destruction of Amun’s names and images, whose ongoing worship had been supported by the dead coruler, should presumably be dated to the final months of his reign.

In the seventeenth year of Akhenaten’s reign, he passed away, and his successor was most likely his younger son, Tutankhaten, who was married to Akhenaten’s third daughter. By the middle of Tutankhamun’s reign, which spanned ten years, the religious status quo had been restored thanks to the guidance of the generals Ay and Horemheb, both of whom would go on to become kings (as he was renamed). It is most likely that immediately following Tutankhamun’s passing, the tomb of Akhenaten in Amarna was defiled, its furnishings were destroyed, and the king’s mummy was set ablaze.

Also Read: Oba Ewuare: Great Benin Empire Trade with the Portuguese