Author

Historian2

Browsing

Political Turmoil in Swaziland

After King Sobhuza II died in 1982, Swaziland faced a period of uncertainty because he had controlled the entire government. Members of the royal family started fighting for power, and some gained support from the Swaziland National Council. Prince Mfanasibili, for example, wanted to make decisions in the absence of a king.

The political group called the Liqoqo, which had existed before colonial rule and was later revived, played a big role in this struggle. It was meant to advise the king, but after Sobhuza’s death, it became unclear how much power it should have.

After Sobhuza’s passing, Queen Regent Dzeliwe took over, appointing 15 members to the Liqoqo, while Prince Sozisa was named “authorized person” to act on her behalf when needed. However, the Liqoqo considered itself above all other government institutions, including the prime minister and the regent.

When Prime Minister Prince Mabandla was accused of planning to remove traditional leaders, he was dismissed and replaced by Prince Bhekimpi, who was loyal to the Liqoqo. The group then started removing government officials they suspected of opposing them. In August 1983, they removed Queen Regent Dzeliwe and replaced her with Queen Ntombi, the mother of Sobhuza’s son, Makhosetive, who was declared the future king.

Many people, including university students, protested against the removal of Dzeliwe. In response, the Liqoqo arrested over 30 students. During this time, new political movements such as the People’s United Democratic Movement (PUDEMO) emerged to demand democracy and good governance. It became clear that without a king, the Swazi political system was unstable. To restore order, supporters of the monarchy decided to crown the young heir. On April 25, 1986, 18-year-old Prince Makhosetive returned from school in England and was crowned King Mswati III. The same year, the Liqoqo was disbanded, and a new prime minister was appointed.

Under Mswati III, Swaziland remained under a state of emergency, which had been in place since 1973. His leadership faced opposition, especially from workers and students. The government continued to use harsh measures against those who opposed the monarchy. For example, in 1990, PUDEMO leaders were charged with treason after distributing pamphlets criticizing the government. They were accused of trying to overthrow the king.

Mswati III realized the need to reform some political systems. One of them was the Tinkhundla system, which rejected modern political parties. In 1991, he created the Tinkhundla Review Commission, known as Vusela, to gather public opinions. However, when the commission presented its findings in 1992, most suggestions for democratization were ignored. According to the report, most Swazis supported the Tinkhundla system.

Despite this, calls for political change continued, with people demanding the removal of the 1973 decree that banned political parties. Traditional leaders opposed these changes, but growing protests made it harder to ignore public demands. More political groups were formed, including the Swaziland Democratic Alliance, which pushed for democratic reforms. This forced Mswati III to address political change.

In 1996, he set up the Constitutional Review Commission (CRC) to draft a new constitution. However, a major conflict arose when traditionalists insisted that the king should appoint the commissioners, while others wanted political groups to have a say. Political groups also demanded that the 1973 decree be removed before any discussions, but the king’s advisors wanted it to remain.

Mswati III went ahead and appointed the commissioners. In 2001, the CRC’s chairman announced that the king’s powers would be expanded, but details were unclear. Later, the king announced the formation of another commission to draft a new constitution, but no significant progress has been made.

The period after Sobhuza’s death has been marked by confusion and unresolved issues from the past. Civil society continues to demand democracy, while the monarchy sees these efforts as a threat. Although Mswati III has tried to make some political changes, his goal has been to strengthen the traditional system rather than allow real democracy. As a result, Swaziland remains isolated, while most countries in Southern Africa have moved toward democratic governance.

Also Read: King Sobhuza II of Swaziland

King Sobhuza II of Swaziland

King Sobhuza

Nkhotfotjeni, later known as King Sobhuza II of Swaziland, was born on July 22, 1899. He was chosen as the heir to the Swazi throne that same year and officially installed as king in 1921. His selection was controversial, as his father left behind six widows, each with a child eligible for succession. The council of princes, tasked with choosing the heir, failed to make a decision, leaving his grandmother, Labotsibeni Mdluli, to determine the successor. Following Swazi law and custom, Sobhuza was chosen, but as he was still a minor, Labotsibeni ruled as queen regent.

While the British recognized Sobhuza as the rightful heir, they insisted that only the British monarch could hold the title of “king,” referring to Sobhuza as “paramount chief.” Sobhuza was the first Swazi king to receive formal education, attending Lovedale College in South Africa from 1916 until 1918, when he was called home due to his grandmother’s deteriorating health and the death of her daughter, Ntongontongo. Labotsibeni recommended he remain in Swaziland to prepare for leadership.

When Sobhuza officially took over in 1921, Swaziland was still reeling from British land alienation policies. His first major action was to continue the Swazi struggle for the return of land taken under the 1907 proclamation. Although his efforts were largely unsuccessful, he did manage to establish the Native Land Settlement Scheme in the 1940s.

King Sobhuza

A key focus of Sobhuza’s rule was preserving Swazi political institutions. Aware that colonialism was dismantling traditional governance structures across Africa, he prioritized strengthening the monarchy. He insisted that colonial officials should not directly interact with the Swazi people in reserves, maintaining the authority of traditional power structures and the Swazi land tenure system.

In the 1940s, he resisted British efforts to reform traditional leadership, rejecting a proposal that Swazi chiefs should be appointed rather than inherit their positions. He insisted that Swazi law and custom should continue to govern succession. This commitment extended into the decolonization period, when modern political parties emerged as a perceived threat to the monarchy. In response, Sobhuza formed his own political movement to secure power during Swaziland’s transition to independence in 1968. His traditionalist faction successfully inherited power from the British, and he remained in control until his death in 1982.

Sobhuza’s reign was marked by a blend of modernization and authoritarian rule. While Swaziland underwent economic development, its political system remained undemocratic. From 1968 onwards, he consolidated power, systematically eliminating political opposition while reinforcing traditional governance. His leadership style emphasized personal rule, with political parties only tolerated if they recognized his authority. The independence constitution granted him executive and legislative powers, making him the ultimate decision-maker in all state affairs. His power was even celebrated in praise songs, which described him as “the mouth that spoke no lie.”

King Sobhuza

Sobhuza maintained control over the government by personally appointing cabinet ministers, ensuring loyalty to the monarchy. His intolerance for opposition was justified through appeals to Swazi tradition, arguing that leadership should not be contested and that political parties were foreign constructs unsuitable for Swaziland. This stance led to increasingly repressive policies.

In 1973, he abolished the independence constitution, arguing that it undermined Swazi traditional governance by allowing political parties to contest for leadership. From then on, opposition was systematically suppressed. Laws were enacted to limit freedoms of expression and association, making protests and gatherings of more than five people illegal without police approval. Violators faced detention for up to sixty days without trial. As a result, most opposition voices were silenced, creating an illusion of national stability.

To further legitimize the monarchy’s authority, Sobhuza implemented the Tinkhundla political system in 1978. This system allowed for parliamentary representation through rural localities called Tinkhundla, but it was primarily designed to entrench the power of the traditional oligarchy and reinforce the king’s dominance.

By the time of Sobhuza’s death in 1982, Swaziland’s governance remained heavily centered around the monarchy. The political system he established continued to suppress opposition, with ministers and officials remaining loyal to the king. Labor unions and political organizations were actively discouraged, as they were perceived as threats to royal authority.

King Sobhuza King Sobhuza

King Sobhuza II’s reign, spanning over six decades, was defined by his relentless efforts to maintain Swazi traditions, consolidate monarchical power, and suppress political opposition. His rule shaped Swaziland’s political landscape, leaving a lasting legacy of centralized authority and resistance to democratic reforms.

Also Read: The Incredible History Of The Man Who Founded The Songhay Empire (r. 1464–1492)